
Establishing
a Systematic Sales Process
for Your
Sales Team
Our
sales methodology is built around the concept of being a percentage
player. What that means is that everything you try will have different
outcomes depending on the circumstances, the timing, the personalities
of the players, and the situation. Our selling system is by no means
foolproof and neither is any other. The remarkable beauty of our sales
system is that when it fails, it fails quickly and effortlessly. In
sales, there are always two winners: the one who was awarded the
sale and the one who lost quickly while minimizing their time, information,
resources and their self-concept. The reason why many salespeople don’t
get to the next level in sales is because they succeed frequently and
they don’t know why, and they fail frequently and they don’t know
why. Our sales system works in tandem to optimize winning and minimize
damage control in losing. For the salesperson transitioning to this
more strategic sales approach, the ladder is the area where improvement
first surfaces.
There
are 7 steps to the Tangent Knowledge Systems’ sales process:
STEP 1 The
Initial Shared Agenda
The
initial shared agenda sets the stage for the ground rules and expectations
of the sales call for both the seller and the prospect. It sets the
tone of how the call will proceed and creates your position of differentiation.
Without
the initial agenda, sales calls can be rudderless and without any focus
on strategy. But the most important element is the use of the “language
of trust” and how it sets the stage of building a relationship on
trust, care, and understanding in lieu of just likeability, needs, information
and mutual interest.
The
initial agenda is probably one of the most difficult strategies for
the uninitiated because it puts the perception of control in the hands
of the prospect and it makes “no” a viable outcome. The strategy
can only be achieved by taking a non-selling posture, which means you
are an objective, detached observer at the selling event. You act as
a neutral “change agent” with the goal of helping the prospect discover
their problems, assess their consequences, gauge the timing and importance
to act or not to act based on their stated mission.
The
following are examples of a generic meeting agenda and its steps:
1.
“Thanks for inviting me in today. By the way, how are you for time
today?”
2.
“Did you have an agenda or any questions you wanted to ask of me before
I get started?”
3.
“We always take a position that we aren’t sure if we can help you
or if what we have is specifically right for you.”
4.
“In order for me to know if we are a good fit, I’d like to ask you
some questions, with the objective to learn more about your business
and what you are looking for. I’m sure you’ll have some questions
to ask of me about our company, our capabilities and our products, which
I welcome.”
5.
“And maybe at the end of our meeting we can determine if we are a
good fit or not. And by the way, if you feel we aren’t, would
you be comfortable in telling me so, so that I don’t waste your
time?”
6.
“In preparing for this meeting, I went to your website and learned
that… (summarize your findings), but what I really wanted to learn
from you is, what are the most important goals and initiatives you are
working on in the next six to twelve months regarding the sales side
of your business, and what hurdles or issues if any are you experiencing
in getting there?”
The
initial shared agenda attempts to alleviate some of the initial stress
and questions that proceed any sales call for a prospect: how
long is this really going to take, what do they have up their sleeve,
what products are they going to try to push on me today, do they understand
my business, when are they going to try to close me and how can I get
out of this gracefully if I’m not interested?
STEP 2
Conditions for Change/Discovery
People
buy for one of two reasons. One reason is for gain, opportunity and
advantage. The other is for pain, fear, insecurity, loss and a sense
of dissatisfaction. You can probably guess which is a far stronger motive.
Psychological research supports that 90% of buying decisions are driven
by pain. However, if you examine the way most salespeople sell you will
see they are working on the wrong end of the problem. They sell from
a position of gain and not pain. And they sell logically and intellectually
instead of emotionally. People buy emotionally and they justify their
decision intellectually. Most salespeople build their strategy around
a logical and intellectual platform that again misses the mark.
Initially
all indications or stated pains are just surface pains. The real discovery
process now begins in determining the cost, the consequences, the accountability
and the actionability of your prospect’s pain.
So
your job is to take the role of a “change agent” in allowing your
prospect the freedom to self-discover and self-examine their problems
without the influence of your selling agenda. The salesperson is best
served when they take the role of a third party observer at the selling
event.
The
salesperson is now free to ask questions that get to the truth, even
at the cost of undermining their own selling position. You want to expose
your prospect’s problems and at the same time balance it with exposing
all the reasons that would motivate them not to take action or to consider
the problem a low priority. As an independent advisor and counselor
you have no vested interest either way. That is a position that will
turn upside down everything most salespeople hold true and sacred. Stop
selling, presenting, providing solutions and closing and get your prospects
to first sell themselves and then sell you. This removes all the burden
of proof and stress on the salesperson and puts it squarely on the shoulders
of where it rightfully belongs, which is with the prospect.
If
you can’t find pain or create it then the chances are slim to none
that your prospect will change and your best course of action is to
withdraw or reprioritize the opportunity. People will always do what
they’ve always done until the pain of change is less than the pain
of the status quo. And what most overly enthusiastic, product- centric
salespeople never realize is in the minds of the prospect, the salesperson
represents the ultimate pain… and that is the pain of change.
To
determine if it is worth the pain of change, you have to build and craft
a well- thought out objective business case as to the pros and cons
of changing. In most cases, this has nothing to do with your product
or service. So leave your PowerPoint and all the attendant bells and
whistles in the trunk of your car permanently, because selling rarely
has anything to do with what you are selling. Keep in mind the best
presentation (product capabilities, justification) is no presentation
at all. The best presentation or education you can provide is educating
your prospect on learning more about their problems and their consequences
and how it relates to their most important success factors for their
company. In many cases, your biggest competition is the behemoth, the
well entrenched, and always favored market leader, which they are always
comfortable turning to with minimum risk: Status Quo Inc.
Once
you have isolated the problem, the following is a small sampling of
the follow-up questions to determine the ramifications and the actionability
of their problems:
- “How long
has it been a problem?”
- “What have
you done to fix it?”
- “How long
have you been thinking about this problem?”
- “How is it
impacting you and your company?”
- “How much
is it costing you?”
- “What is
your stake in the resolution?”
- “When you
went to your existing supplier and shared your frustrations, what reassurances
did they give you that the problem would be rectified?”
- “With or
without us, how committed are you to fixing the problem?”
If
they don’t have any pain that is actionable, or they have pain but
they have a high threshold for living with it, then you have nowhere
to go. In sales, there are always two winners: the one who was
awarded the sale and the other who lost quickly and effortlessly. This
should be your guiding light when you are qualifying accounts. 90% of
all sales are won and lost in the ‘conditions/discovery for change’
step. In traditional product-centric sales, this discovery step is strictly
a cursory step and a courtesy as salespeople run to the exciting dog
and pony show. The act of taking a prospect through this self-discovery
process is what relationship selling is built on. This is the best way
to build trust and rapport.
STEP 3
Investment -- “Show Me The Money”
This
step covers three areas of investment: funding, timing and resources.
If they have pain and have a compelling reason to change but they can’t
afford your solution or haven’t the available funds, what is the likelihood
of change? Nil! But, what if they do have the funds but can’t seem
to get their act together to invest the time necessary to initiate a
change. What is the likelihood of change? Slim to nothing. Or, they
have pain, the means and the timing, but can’t marshal the necessary
resources to make the change happen efficiently and effectively, what
is the likelihood of change? Negligible.
To
find out if they are willing to allocate the funds necessary to get
rid of their pain, all you have to do is go back to what they told you
the pain was costing them in Step 2 to determine if they are willing
to invest X to get rid of Y. Most salespeople build their case around
the idea that if the funds are there that they can be allocated. In
some cases, they’ve got the money, they just aren’t going to spend
it with you.
In
the investment step, it is also critical to find out what they are willing
to invest (dollars) to get rid of their pain. If they aren’t willing
to share this information, it is more than likely that you didn’t
do a good job of creating rapport or trust in Step 1 or Step 2. Money
is never the real issue, the real issue is that they may believe your
solution isn’t worth the money, and in some cases, it isn’t because
you didn’t or couldn’t build a strong enough business case or business
justification for them to change. That’s why your job description
mirrors more of a business strategist or consultant than it does a salesperson.
Understanding
the timing is a critical area that most salespeople ignore or breeze
over. In relationship to other initiatives and projects the prospect
is working on, do they have the time and is the timing favorable to
execute a change? How many times have you been stalled and left at the
altar by a prospect’s denial of the amount of time they will have
to put aside to push this project through, or the prospect’s unwillingness
to take time away from other projects to expedite yours?
Likewise
with resources. If they have to reallocate resources away from emergency
funds and IT to your project and your prospect doesn’t have the political
will or influence to reallocate these high demand resources, your rosy
future is dead in the water. So you must learn all about what is going
on in the company and what are all the competing initiatives and mission
critical projects that might supersede your solution. Learn to ask the
tough questions that will get you to the truth and the only way to effectively
do that is asking questions that are in your disfavor and have the potential
to dismantle your selling position. This strategy is likened to “going
for no” instead of always asking favorable questions that will elicit
“yes” answers.
If
they have pain, but don’t have the funds, the time, or the resources
necessary to facilitate the change, then you can withdraw, or you may
reprioritize your prospect and make them a “B” account instead of
an “A” account. Too many salespeople are reluctant to bring up money
and proceed to making world-class presentations to prospects who have
no means to buy.
STEP 4
Decision Process -- Who, When, Where
Typically
the decision step is skimmed over quickly because by the time most salespeople
get there, they are so excited to get to the close. The questions most
salespeople default to in locating the decision maker is the “who”
question. The “who” question will always get you the wrong information.
If you ask the non-decision maker if they are the new decision maker
and they answer yes, what they really heard, or better yet, what their
ego heard, is “are you the decision maker to bring this to the final
decision maker?” The flip side is when you ask the real decision maker
who the decision maker is, that individual, feeling pressure, palms
you off on a fictitious committee that allegedly makes a group decision,
letting them off the hook.
What
you need to ask are process questions. Process questions uncover the
“progression of events” that lead to a decision. These questions
include the who, what, where, when, why and how. The following are very
important elements to ascertain in the decision making step:
- “Who has
the ear of senior management?”
- “Who can
shut this proposal down?”
- “Specifically,
who needs to be on board?”
- “Who are
the financial stakeholders, champions, technical evaluators, cost evaluators
and end users?”
- “What will
you need to win support of others?”
- “What was
the decision process you used last time when you made a decision like
this?”
- “Who signs
the check?”
- “Does the
CEO rubber-stamp this or are they intimately involved”?
- “Beside
yourself, does anyone else help you in making this decision?”
- “What reason
would you use to recommend us and can you think of any reason at this
stage not to recommend us?”
- “When is
the latest you’d like to make a decision? Why is that date important?”
In
the event they aren’t the financial decision maker, you must prepare
yourself to sell the invisible decision maker or committee. Before you
proceed to submit your proposal so it can be in turn submitted to the
committee or final decision maker, make sure you understand the process
and the past history of similar situations. Keep in mind that you always
want to bring the future to the present if you are going to be an absentee
salesperson at the final event. Here are some questions you might want
to ask to increase your odds:
- “When you
present to the committee do you recommend one choice or a couple of
alternatives?”
- “What questions
do you think they’ll ask of you?”
- “What criteria
will be important to them?”
- “What objections
will they raise?”
- “Will I
have access to the members of the committee before you present?”
- “What if
they ask questions of you and you can’t answer them sufficiently?
Would you like me to be available by
cell to help you? Would it be helpful if I was at your office and available
at the time to answer any questions?”
- “What will
you do if they turn you down?”
If
you are locked out of the decision process and you believe your competition
has the inside track, you may need to reevaluate your commitment or
change your strategy. You always have the choice of backing out and
not playing by their rules if they don’t favor your cause. This decision
will rest heavily on many variables including the health of your existing
pipeline and how busy you are.
Once
you have a prospect who has pain that they can’t live with, has the
time and means to allocate to get rid of this pain, and is in a position
to make a decision to spend the money to get rid of their pain… then
you have a qualified prospect. This prospect is now qualified for your
time, your information, your company resources, and your self-esteem
that you’ll now be putting into this deal. However, if they aren’t
in a position to make a decision or if you don’t have the right access,
then more than likely you are just whistling in the wind. If you have
really done your due diligence and properly qualified them for pain,
investment and decision process then I believe you have certifiable,
qualified prospect. They will definitely buy from someone. What we don’t
know for sure is who they will buy from. However, if you took the time
and had the expertise to do the following I believe you will be very
well positioned to be awarded the deal:
- You helped them
identify their problem in a way that they never thought of, therefore
differentiating yourself from your competition.
- You helped them
do a cost/benefit analysis of their problem so that they understand
the cost of moving forward and the consequences of inaction.
- You took the
position of a business strategist and built a business case, not a product-centric
case.
- Since you took
the time to understand their problem better than your competition did,
it is implied that you will now be in a better position to give the
best solution. Remember the salesperson who does the best job of identifying
and understanding their problems will consistently outsell the salesperson
that has the best product or solution.
- Because you did
the preceding, you are in the best position to have the strongest relationship
with your prospect. And relationships are what prospects put their trust
and confidence in.
But
before we jump to presenting our solution, there is a very critical
intermediary step that needs to be dealt with. This is the step we confirm
for the timing of how the deal will go down.
STEP 5
The Pre-Commitment Agreement
Your
purpose in this step is to ascertain what specifically happens after
you make your presentation or outline your solution. For example:
“John, if I present my solution to you next Tuesday will you have
everything necessary you need to be able to give me a
“yes” or “no” decision?” This question firms up everything
you learned in the preceding steps. In sales, your job isn’t to sell.
Your mandate is to get people to make decisions and to allow “no”
as a viable choice. Too often salespeople will do the traditional close
of, “If I can show you a way to solve your problem, will you buy
today?” And too often they get the traditional response of “yes”
when in fact it is a very conditional and tenuous “yes”.
Be
prepared at this point to have the prospect tell you, “We need
to get quotes from our existing suppliers.”
Agree with them that it makes sense. After you ask them when they are
meeting with your competitors, request that you’d like to be in last.
If they won’t let you be last, what does that tell you? You probably
don’t have the inside track and you need to reassess whether you will
go through the exercise. Again, this will depend on the strength of
your relationship, the health of your pipeline and how busy you are.
This is a judgment call you’ll be asked to continually make throughout
the selling process. The only difference now is you won’t jump recklessly
at every opportunity and you’ll have more data to make non-emotional,
informed decisions.
STEP 6
Solution & Fulfillment
The
solution step is generally the easiest step in the sales process. Since
approximately 80% of sales are won and lost in the pain discovery step,
most salespeople are equipped to do a good job in the solution and fulfillment
step. It is the easiest step in the sales process. This step should
be a no-brainer. Traditional salespeople who have been schooled in feature
and benefit selling can finally relax knowing they have a skill set
which, when used appropriately and sparingly, can be transferred successfully
over to a consultative sales process.
Here
are some key elements and guidelines to executing the solution step:
- Ideally you won’t
even need to do a presentation, because the best presentation is no
presentation at all. Frequently you’ll find that a successful discovery
step will negate the need to provide a solution since it is implied
that if you have a solid grasp of their problem you certainly will have
the ability to effectively solve their problem with your solution.
- Review the client’s
goals and pains at the beginning of the solution step to confirm that
nothing has changed since the last meeting.
- Review their
intent as to what they will be deciding on at the end of the meeting.
Example: “At the end of our meeting today, what are your
expectations as far as making a decision?”
- Know how much
time they have for the meeting and know their agenda.
- Know the criteria
beforehand for going beyond their expectations and meeting their basic
expectations for product or service performance.
- Call in advance
to make sure the right people are going to be there.
- Know the roles
of the people in the meeting and their specific issues and pains.
- Don’t do a
classic feature and benefit “pray and spray.” Simply provide documentation
of how you will solve their problems.
- Do a reality
check to see if they like what they’ve seen so far. Example: “Based
on what you’ve seen so far, on a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate
your interest?” If they give you a high number or resounding approval,
try getting closure by asking, “What should we do next?”
- If your final
proposal is emailed make sure it is a discussion document that will
be used for a follow-up telephone call.
- Proposals should
be written for the invisible decision makers.
- At the beginning
of the meeting ask, “What absolutely will they have to be convinced
of today to move forward?”
Here
are some examples of some tactics to use for closure:
- “Is there
anything else you need to discuss before we decide what the next step
is?”
- “How would
you like to start?”
- “At this
stage, all I need is your approval to go ahead and get started.”
- “That’s
pretty much what we planned to cover today. The question now is, do
you like it and if so, what is the next step?”
- Summarize what
they like and ask them, “What’s next?”
- “These are
our recommendations. How would you like to proceed?”
The
last thing you want to do if you don’t get a final decision is to
do future damage control:
- “When I
follow up with you next week and if I don’t hear back from you, how
will I know if it is because you are busy or if it because you are just
not interested?”
- “Can we
agree in advance that when I call you next week, you’ll give me a
definitive decision one way or another and if it is a
“no”, I promise not to arm wrestle you and I’ll respect your decision?
If it is a “yes”, we’ll decide on what the next step is to move
forward.”
STEP 7
After-Sales Reality Check
This
is where you confirm the sale and manage future expectations as to how
you will effectively install or execute your solution. Most salespeople
have been wrongly schooled to evacuate immediately after they have gotten
a final commitment before the door hits them in the behind and their
customer changes their mind.
First
you want to ask if they have any questions or reservations about moving
forward. Always allow the prospect the freedom to change their mind.
What kind of salesperson, you ask, would do something as silly as that?
The answer is, a confident salesperson who believes in their solution
and one who honors their prospect’s independent thought process.
It
is best to have the prospect initiate the commitment and not just respond
to the salesperson’s request for closure. If you are going to get
back-outs, now is the time to find that out since you have a chance
to salvage the deal. What you want to avoid at all cost is the email
message when you return to the office that tells you they have changed
their mind and are going to put your order on hold. You also want to
avoid the frustration of the incessant follow-up that will naturally
happen as you try to salvage the deal to no avail.
The
after-sale reality check is where you also help your prospect manage
future expectations. This is where you review the logistics and timing
of how your solution will be installed. During this step, you set up
all the contingency plans for possible delays and issues.